Kolski Ex Rel. Kolski v. Kolski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a statute of frauds defense is inapplicable to such equitable claims as unjust enrichment, restitution, and imposition of a constructive trust
• holding that \the statute of frauds is simply inapplicable to ...\ claims for \unjust enrichment/restitution and the imposition of a constructive trust.\
• holding that allegations of complaint were sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss where the complaint alleged that writing did not contain the entire agreement of the parties due to a unilateral mistake by one party and the inequitable conduct of the other party
• holding statute of frauds “simply inapplicable” to claims for “unjust enrichment/restitution and the imposition of a constructive trust”
• “Florida law provides that electronic signatures ‘may be used to sign a writing and shall have the same force and effect as a written signature.’”
• “To satisfy the statute, a note or memorandum may take almost any possible form.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).