Kolmer v. Rosenblum (Ballot title certified)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the district court erred in limiting the structure to only one of the disclosed embodiments when the patentee disclosed alternative embodiments
• the combination of the accused device with other components must contain all of the elements of the patented claim
• the accused device was a Motorola-configured device that could be combined with other Motorola components to satisfy all of the limitations of the patented claim
• “[disclosed structure includes that which is described in a patent specification, including any alternative structures identified”
• claim limitation “automatically determining at least the last-dialed number of the telephone number dialed on the telephone communications-type device” was not subject to Section 112(6
• invention could use “a microprocessor based system” as well as “discrete logical circuitry”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).