Kollodge v. F. AND L. APPLIANCES, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the court may not read statutory language out of context
• stating that the court may not read statutory language out of context
• stating that particular provision of statute cannot be read out of context
• stating that particular provision of statute cannot be read out of context
• acknowledging as “a cardinal rule of statutory construction” that a particular provision of a statute must be read in context with other related provisions to determine its meaning
• defining the term “crosswalk” as “uncontrolled crosswalk! ]” because of the context of the statute even when the legislature knew how to distinguish between controlled and uncontrolled intersections

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).