Skip to main content
· 12/5/2005

Kolela Mpoyo v. Litton Electro-Optical Systems

Citations

  • 430 F.3d 985
  • 11 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 65
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 26471
  • 87 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,180
  • 2005 WL 3299816

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the first res judicata criterion is “whether the two suits arise out of the same transactional nucleus of facts”
  • holding that a summary judgment dismissal is “considered a decision on the merits for [claim preclusion] purposes”
  • holding that while “the latter three criteria do[] not yield a clear outcome,” the “first criterion controls” and established res judicata
  • concluding that two sets of claims both 10 involved a common nucleus of operative fact where they arose from defendant’s “conduct while 11 [plaintiff] was an employee and specifically from the events leading to his termination”
  • concluding that former 16 employee’s Title VII, FLSA, and FMLA claims arose from same transaction because they 17 “form[ed] a convenient trial unit that discloses a cohesive narrative of an employee- 18 employer relationship and a controversial termination”
  • holding that the second and third res judicata criteria are “whether rights or interests established in the prior judgment would be destroyed or impaired by prosecution of the second action [and] whether the two suits involve infringement of the same right”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beezer, Kozinski, Carney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.