Kolakowski v. 10839 Assoc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that scope of employment “is governed by the law of the State where the alleged tort was committed”
• explaining that the “burden of proving the existence of subject matter jurisdiction rests with the party invoking federal jurisdiction”
• explaining that the “burden of proving the existence of subject matter jurisdiction rests with the party invoking federal jurisdiction”
• noting that a jurisdictional issue may be “so bound up with the merits that a full trial on the merits is needed to resolve the question”
• “The burden of proving the existence of subject matter jurisdiction rests with the party invoking federal jurisdiction”
• “The burden of proving the existence of subject matter jurisdiction rests with the party invoking federal jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).