Kokx v. Bylenga

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that parties cannot enter a binding stipulation regarding the law applicable to their claims
• observing that parties cannot enter a binding stipulation regarding the law applicable to their claims
• stating that a court’s decision on a motion for reconsideration is reviewed for an abuse of discretion
• holding that a trial court did not violate MCR 2.119(F) when it changed its decision to deny summary disposition in response to a motion for reconsideration that “offered no new evidence or argument, but merely revisited the same issue presented in the [original] motion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).