Kohut v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an act “provide[d] no support for the conclusion” that the Colorado General Assembly intended a statute to apply retroactively based on “the only legislative document either party has cited” with respect “to [the statute’s] legislative history”
• “To overcome this presumption, a statute must clearly reveal a legislative intent that it be applied retroactively.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).