Skip to main content
· 2/24/2014

Kohring v. United States

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 1336
  • 188 L. Ed. 2d 344
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3493
  • 571 U.S. 1222
  • 2014 WL 684426
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 1088

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • district court did not abuse discretion in treating all employees as similarly situated where the essential claim was that employer “required them to work off the clock and altered their recorded hours in an effort to avoid paying overtime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.