Skip to main content
· 12/8/1992

Kohn v. City of Miami Beach

Citations

  • 611 So. 2d 538
  • 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12346
  • 1992 WL 360847

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion where the plaintiff failed in four attempts to cure the defects in the complaint
  • explaining that “as an action progresses, the privilege of amendment progressively decreases to the point that the trial judge does not abuse his discretion in dismissing with prejudice”
  • finding no error in dismissing pro se's complaint with prejudice after four amendments; pro se litigant should not be treated differently from litigant represented by counsel
  • “[I]t is a mistake to hold a pro se litigant to a lesser standard than a reasonably competent attorney.”
  • \[I]t is a mistake to hold a pro se litigant to a lesser standard than a reasonably competent attorney.\
  • “We conclude that it is a mistake to hold a pro se litigant to a lesser standard than a reasonably competent attorney.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwartz, C.J., and Hubbart and Nesbitt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.