Kohler v. Germain Investment Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he fact that various parties may be liable for the contamination does not excuse plaintiffs from the statutory obligation to exercise reasonable diligence in determining the responsible party.”
• “[T]he fact that various parties may be liable for the contamination does not excuse plaintiffs from the statutory obligation to exercise reasonable diligence in determining the responsible party.”
• “[I]f the relevant facts and inferences are not in dispute relative to application of the statute of limitations, that question may be resolved as a matter of law.”
• “[I]f the relevant facts and inferences are not in dispute relative to application of the statute of limitations, that question may be resolved as a matter of law.”
• the fact that various parties may be liable for an injury does not excuse a plaintiff from the statutory obligation to exercise reasonable diligence in determining the responsible party
• the fact that various parties may be liable for an injury does not excuse a plaintiff from the statutory obligation to exercise reasonable diligence in determining the responsible party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).