KOHLER Et Al. v. VAN PETEGHEM Et Al.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no abuse of discretion in excluding from testifying an expert witness who was named in violation of express deadlines in a discovery order
• no abuse of discretion in excluding from testifying an expert witness who was named in violation of express deadlines in a discovery order
• no abuse of discretion in the exclusion of expert testimony where plaintiff failed to identify expert or provide information about his testimony until 16 months after the scheduling order deadline and on eve of trial
• no abuse of discretion in the exclusion of expert testimony where plaintiff failed to identify expert or provide information about his testimony until 16 months after the scheduling order deadline and on eve of trial
• “The touching of another without her consent, even if minimal, constitutes a battery. Moreover, the unlawful touching of a person’s body is actionable even if the unlawful touching is indirect, as by throwing an object or substance at the person.”
• “The touching of another without her consent, even if minimal, constitutes a battery. Moreover, the unlawful touching of a person’s body is actionable even if the unlawful touching is indirect, as by throwing an object or substance at the person.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).