Skip to main content
· 9/17/1997

Kohler Co. And Subsidiaries v. United States

Citations

  • 124 F.3d 1451
  • 80 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6487
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 25211
  • 1997 WL 573491

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting with approval that, in Hamilton Industries, the court rejected the LIFO system because it “was not only compensating for inflation but was permitting the taxpayer to postpone gains associated with bargain priced inventory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lourie, Clevenger, Schall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.