Skip to main content
· 3/5/2003

Koh v. Microtek International, Inc.

Citations

  • 250 F. Supp. 2d 627
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4003
  • 2003 WL 1205531

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that plaintiffs chosen forum is not entitled to substantial weight when the claims have no connection to chosen forum
  • noting the second factor is difficult to weigh where “‘[n]either party [has] provide[d] the requisite particularity about the expected witnesses and their potential testimony to accord this factor much weight’”
  • noting the second factor is difficult to weigh where “‘[n]either party [has] provide[d] the requisite particularity about the expected witnesses and their potential testimony to accord this factor much weight’”
  • severing claims against a retailer and the manufacturer and importer of the product
  • “[I]t is permissible to infer, absent any contrary evidence from the non-movant, that witnesses ... involved in the design and manufacture of the accused products are material.”
  • “[M]ovant[s] must establish that both venue and jurisdiction with respect to each defendant is proper in the transferee district.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Payne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.