Kogan v. Dreifuss

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the discretionary factors considered should be relevant to the nature and purpose of the specific application at issue
• finding that the IJ’s discretionary grant of relief was not appropriate after a de novo review of the evidence
• explaining that § 240A (b) provides relief for which both permanent and nonpermanent residents may be eligible
• explaining that “[a]ccording to the legislative history, the purpose of the VAWA provisions amending the Act was to permit battered spouses to leave their abusers without fear of deportation or other immigration consequences.”
• explaining that “[a]ccording to the legislative history, the purpose of the VAWA provisions amending the Act was to permit battered spouses to leave their abusers without fear of deportation or other immigration consequences.”
• explaining that ‘[a]ccording to the legislative history, the purpose of the VAWA provisions amending the Act was to per- mit battered spouses to leave their abusers without fear of depor- tation or other immigration consequences.’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).