Koga v. Yoshida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an insurer’s “silence” after receipt of a settlement demand approximately two months before the contractual limitations period ran did not amount to an estoppel and did not foreclose summary judgment in favor of the insurer
• discussing the application of estoppel to an insurer
• discussing the application of estoppel to an insurer
• discussing the application of estoppel to an insurer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).