Skip to main content
· 6/10/1887

Koepsel v. Allen

Citations

  • 68 Tex. 446
  • 4 S.W. 856
  • 1887 Tex. LEXIS 714

Syllabus

<p>1. Survey—Mistake.—Though in ascertaining the true location of a corner of a survey, a call for a natural object is of the highest dignity, to which other conflicting calls must yield, yet such a call is only invested with superior dignity because of its greater certainty; since the surveyor is more likely to have been mistaken in his calls for course, distance and quantity than in a call for a fixed natural object. It does not follow, however, that a call for a natural object must, if the object be found, fix it absolutely as one of the bounds of the survey, since the surveyor may have committed a mistake in calling even for the natural object; to show such mistake evidence is admissible. See opinion for facts illustrating the rule.</p>

Judges: Gaines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.