Skip to main content

Koenig v. State

Citations

  • 933 N.E.2d 1271
  • 2010 Ind. LEXIS 547
  • 2010 WL 3638540

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding trial court’s admission of laboratory report without opportunity to confront its creator was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt given defendant’s self-implicating statements to police
  • holding trial court’s admission of laboratory report without opportunity to confront its creator was harmless 17 beyond a reasonable doubt given defendant’s self-implicating statements to police
  • violation of right to cross-examination does not require reversal if State can show beyond a reasonable doubt that error did not contribute to verdict
  • erroneous admission of out-of-court lab report, in violation of defendant's right to confront witnesses, was harmless considering other evidence presented
  • “Violations of the right of cross-examination do not require reversal if the State can show beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to the verdict”
  • alleged denials of the right to confrontation are subject to harmless-error analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.