Koehnen v. Dufuor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the defendant did not forfeit protection of Minnesota’s dramshop act, under which social hosts are immune, by charging her guests a $2 to $4 fee to attend a party
• holding the defendant did not forfeit protection of Minnesota's dramshop act, under which social hosts are immune, by charging her guests a $2 to $4 fee to attend a party
• “Where the legislature has perceived this court’s holdings to have strayed from its intent, it has reacted by amending the Act accordingly.”
• describing history of the Civil Damages Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).