Koehn v. RD Werner Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that testimony submitted for a legitimate purpose cannot be characterized as unfairly prejudicial
• “[P]rejudice which calls for exclusion is given a specialized meaning: an undue tendency to suggest decision on an improper basis, commonly an emotional one, such as bias, sympathy, hatred, contempt, retribution or horror.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).