Kodzoff v. Paul

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the plaintiffs’ proposed damage class could “serve as appropriate vehicles for the award of both monetary and injunctive relief’
• “[I]t is not necessary, at the class certification stage, for Plaintiffs to show that each and every class member could satisfy an individualized standing inquiry.”
• “[E]ven if an Airline already had adopted [a policy] prior to the onset of the conspiracy alleged ... this would not preclude the conclusion that this Airline nevertheless joined the conspiracy....”
• “[I]t is somewhat striking that representatives of the [competing firms] found so many opportunities to at least ‘compare notes’ ... where ... cooperation among [the firms] was by no means necessary for any individual [firm] to take effective action[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).