Skip to main content
· 2/16/1999

Kodrick v. Ferguson

Citations

  • 54 F. Supp. 2d 788
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1806
  • 1999 WL 98020

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • agency principles are not applicable and employer subscriber is not vicariously liable when employee obtains a report under false pretenses and for personal use
  • legislative history of the 1996 amendments to the FCRA “indicates that Congress did not intend that we establish differing rules for subscribers based on the agency law in each forum”
  • discussing legislative history of FCRA’s preemption provisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.