Kociolek v. Hagmann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a congressman asserting the Speech or Debate Clause privilege in a grand-jury proceeding “should be permitted to indicate by affidavit or testimony those calls which he contends are privileged”
• suggesting that documents memorializing legislative activities may be usable against third parties
• asserting invasion of privilege, Representative has standing to intervene and move to quash subpoena directed to Clerk of House of Representatives
• order denying Congressman's motion to quash subpoena directed to Custodian of Records of House of Representatives on speech and debate clause grounds is final
• order refusing to quash subpoena to Clerk of House of Representatives; appeal by congressman allowed
• because intervenor lacks standing in motion to quash subpoena for legislative records there is no need to reach question whether Schofield applies to intervenors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).