Skip to main content
· 2/25/2000

Kochcapital, Inc. v. Seabury & Smith, Inc.

Citations

  • 99 Wash. App. 1044
  • 2000 Wash. App. LEXIS 3006

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the voluntary refusal to accept treatment precludes an Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need
  • affirming grant of summary judgment for physician’s assistant because the record showed he did request an MRI
  • plaintiff’s “voluntary refusal to complete [treatment] as ordered precludes an Eight Amendment claim against” defendant
  • “[Plaintiff’s] voluntary refusal to complete . . . treatment as ordered precludes an Eighth Amendment claim against [a physician assistant defendant].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.