Koch v. Hankins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• if “the court in the first action would clearly not have had jurisdiction to entertain the omitted theory or ground . . . then a second action in a competent court presenting the omitted theory or ground should be held not precluded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Franceschi v. Franchise Tax Board
  California Court of Appeal· 2016-07-08· cited 20×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs
  Supreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 13,852×
• Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
  Supreme Court· 1985-04-22· cited 1,589×
• Adrian C. Eichman v. Fotomat Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1985-05-10· cited 86×
• Mattson v. City of Costa Mesa
  California Court of Appeal· 1980-06-02· cited 63×
• Merry v. Coast Community College District
  California Court of Appeal· 1979-09-25· cited 41×
• Craig v. County of Los Angeles
  California Court of Appeal· 1990-06-29· cited 20×