Koch v. Estrella

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that alien who has engaged in immigration fraud cannot adjust status absent a waiver of inadmissibility under INA § 212(i)
• explaining that the term “judgment” in subsection 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) has been held to refer to discretionary decisions by Sepulveda and its progeny
• noting that the Court lacked jurisdiction to review a waiver of inadmissibility because the petition “[did] not raise any ‘constitutional claims or questions of law. . . .’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).