Koch v. Construction Technology, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the bond’s requirement that the principal and surety pay “all just claims for damages or injury to property” expanded on the statute’s minimum coverage requirement of “labor and materials”
• noting that the \overwhelming majority of jurisdictions do not construe\ pay-when-paid clauses \so as to release the general contractor from all obligation to make payment to the subcontractor in case of nonperformance by the owner\
• noting that the “overwhelming majority of jurisdictions do not construe” pay-when-paid clauses “so as to release the general contractor from all obligation to make payment to the subcontractor in case of nonperformance by the owner”
• noting that the “overwhelming majority of jurisdictions do not construe” pay- when-paid clauses “so as to release the general contractor from all obligation to make payment to the subcontractor in case of nonperformance by the owner”
• noting that the “overwhelming majority of jurisdictions do not construe” pay- when-paid clauses “so as to release the general contractor from all obligation to make payment to the subcontractor in case of nonperformance by the owner”
• “[I] t is well-established that condition precedents are not favored in contract law, and will not be upheld unless there is clear language to support them.” (quoting Harlan, 796 S.W.2d at 958 (Tenn.App.1990))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).