Koch v. Abelson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an initial, defective notice that does not indicate the date and time of a hearing can be cured if a subsequent notice of hearing containing that information is provided
• noting that, had the Supreme Court intended such a far-reaching jurisdictional ruling in Pereira , it likely would not have referred to its holding as \narrow\
• noting that, had the Supreme Court intended such a far-reaching jurisdictional ruling in Pereira , it likely would not have referred to its holding as \narrow\
• “[A] notice to appear that does not specify the time and place of an alien’s initial removal hearing vests an Immigration Judge with jurisdiction over the removal proceedings and meets the requirements of [8 U.S.C. § 1229(a) (2012
• discussing cases from the Fifth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Circuits
• an NTA that does not specify the time and place of a non-citizen’s initial removal hearing still vests an immigration judge with jurisdiction over the removal proceedings so long as a notice of hearing specifying this information is later sent to the non-citizen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).