· 7/12/1985
Kobel v. Martelli
Citations
- 112 A.D.2d 756
- 492 N.Y.S.2d 256
- 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56127
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that \the complaint and subsequent amended complaint in this action themselves constituted such notice\ and that it was \at the very least an issue of fact as to whether reasonably timely notice of breach was given\
- holding that \the complaint and subsequent amended complaint in this action themselves constituted such notice\ and that it was \at the very least an issue of fact as to whether reasonably timely notice of breach was given\
- applying section 2-607(3) and observing “that the complaint and subsequent amended complaint in this action themselves constituted such notice”
- finding “issue of fact as to whether [defendant] breached the same contracts, i.e., the various purchase orders, as distinct from the representation agreement itself”
- analyzing under U.C.C. the parties’ agreement designating plaintiff as “the sole representative” of defendant “in North America” and requiring plaintiff to order specific amounts of product from defendant per year
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.