Knutson v. Reichel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘While the trial court considered the problem as one of ambiguity warranting reformation of the deed, and we have viewed it as one of construction, the result is the same.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Roeder Co. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1986-03-27· cited 51×
• RHN CORP. v. Veibell
  Utah Supreme Court· 2004-07-16· cited 39×
• Glover v. Giraldo
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1992-01-22· cited 22×
• Haggart v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2012-12-18· cited 21×
• Medical Building Land Co. v. Department of Revenue
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1978-07-12· cited 20×
• Bernhard v. Reischman
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-01-10· cited 6×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hirt v. Entus
  Washington Supreme Court· 1950-11-24· cited 34×
• State ex rel. Davis v. Superior Court
  Washington Supreme Court· 1915-03-01· cited 14×
• Commissioners Commercial Waterway District No. 2 v. Seattle Factory Sites Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1913-10-25· cited 10×
• Harris v. Swart Mortgage Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1952-10-23· cited 9×
• Vavrek v. Parks
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1972-04-10· cited 8×
• Wardell v. Commercial Waterway District No. 1
  Washington Supreme Court· 1914-07-22· cited 5×