Knutsen v. Frushour

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• corporation owned land which could have been used to barter for the land it desired

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Simplot v. Simplot
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1974-06-13· cited 68×
• House v. Estate of Edmondson
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2008-01-25· cited 65×
• Aqua-Culture Technologies, Ltd. v. Holly
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1996-05-30· cited 55×
• Robinson v. Joint Sch. Dist. No. 331 Minidoka
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1983-10-06· cited 46×
• Kidwell v. Meikle
  Ninth Circuit· 1979-06-01· cited 41×
• Jenkins v. Jenkins
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2003-01-30· cited 6×
• Aqua-Culture Technologies Ltd. v. Dr. Sandra F. Holly
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1989-09-29
• J. O. House v. Estate of J. K. Edmondson - Dissenting
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2008-01-25

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Meridian Bowling Lanes, Inc. v. Brown
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 41×
• Bennett v. Propp
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1962-12-28· cited 32×
• White v. Boydstun
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1967-05-24· cited 25×
• Hawkins v. Chandler
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1964-10-14· cited 19×
• Jensen v. Sidney Stevens Implement Co.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1922-12-04· cited 19×
• Applications of Intermountain Gas Company
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1955-11-29· cited 12×
• Melgard v. Moscow Idaho Seed Co.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1952-12-03· cited 9×
• Hanny v. Sunnyside Ditch Company
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1960-06-10· cited 9×
• Lano v. Rochester Germicide Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1962-01-26· cited 9×
• Petrishen v. Westmoreland Finance Corp.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-01-12· cited 5×