Skip to main content
· 3/20/1992

Knudson v. LeMarr

Citations

  • 787 F. Supp. 835
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3636
  • 1992 WL 59075

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that DOCCS is a New York State agency that has immunity under the Eleventh Amendment
  • describing the retaliation standard for an adverse action as “lesser” when compared to the discrimination standard
  • noting “a hostile work environment constitutes an adverse employment action” for a discrimination claim (citing Alfano v. 26 Costello, 294 F.3d 365, 373 (2d Cir. 2022))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Norgle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.