Knuckles v. Celebrezze

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Court granted motion for alternative service five months after complaint was filed
• stating that if a country refused to complete service pursuant to Article 13, “such a refusal would preclude service of the complaint as contrary to the terms of the Convention and therefore impermissible under Rule 4(f)(3)”
• authorizing email service despite India's objection to Article 10(a), because “India did not expressly object to electronic mail as a means of service”
• permitting service by email to a defendant located in India and noting “objection to service through postal channels does not amount to an express rejection of service via electronic mail”
• permitting alternative means of service on private defendants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).