Skip to main content
· 10/15/1881

Knox v. McDonald

Citations

  • 32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 268

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Uniformity Clause proscribes the unequal treatment of certain individuals based upon their income
  • holding that an occupational privilege tax levied upon individuals working in the city and earning over $600 annually was non-uniform because persons earning less than that amount were exempted from liability
  • striking down ordinance imposing tax on individuals engaged in an occupation with gross earnings of $600 or more
  • striking down ordinance imposing tax on individuals engaged in an occupation with gross earnings of $600 or more
  • “In determining the severability of a statute or ordinance, the legislative intent is of primary significance.”
  • “In determining the severability of a statute or ordinance, the legislative intent is of primary significance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haight, Hardin, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.