Knox v. Bland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that federal courts “have no authority to issue a writ to direct state courts or their judicial officers in the performance of their duties” (cleaned up)
• reasoning that “[w]e have no authority to issue . . . a writ to direct state courts or their judicial officers in the performance of their duties” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• reasoning that “[w]e have no authority to issue . . . a writ to direct state courts or their judicial officers in the performance of their duties” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• declining to grant injunctive relief because an inmate did not “show[] that either condition was satisfied”
• stating “injunctive relief against a judicial officer shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable”
• explaining injunctive relief is ordinarily unavailable against a state judicial officer under § 1983

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).