Knowlton v. Sandaker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• analyzing Restatement Sec. 392 without adopting it, concluding it was of no use to the plaintiff given the facts of the case
• analyzing Restatement § 392 without adopting it, concluding it was of no use to the plaintiff given the facts of the case
• res ipsa submission improper when evidence showed two equally plausible explanations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).