Knowlton Merritt v. John E. MacKey and Jerry Howard, Knowlton Merritt v. John E. MacKey Steve Vincent

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the law of the case should be followed absent “substantially 10 different” evidence or a change in controlling law
• “The prior decision of legal issues should be followed on a later appeal unless the [subsequent] evidence ... was substantially different[.]”
• under the law of the case doctrine, an appellate court panel will not reconsider questions that another panel has previously decided in the same case
• under the law of the case doctrine, an appellate court panel will not reconsider questions that another panel has previously decided in the same case
• under the law of the case doctrine, one panel of an appellate court will not reconsider questions that another panel has decided on a prior appeal in the same case
• “The time involved is clearly subsumed in the lodestar figure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).