Knowles v. Muniz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the Federal A-3090-20 9 Arbitration Act preempts \courts from nullifying class action waiver provisions in arbitration agreements based upon state-law notions of unconscionability or public policy.\
• finding that plaintiff’s claims against a car dealership were not arbitrable where conflicting arbitration provisions were “scattered” among three agreements, each of which purportedly applied to “all claims” arising out of plaintiff’s vehicle purchase
• declining to enforce a car dealership's arbitration provisions where its contract forms were internally inconsistent and too vague and indefinite in several material respects
• declining to enforce a car dealership's arbitration provisions where its contract forms were internally inconsistent and too vague and indefinite in several material respects
• declining to sever unenforceable parts of an arbitration clause where doing so would \leave[] uncertainty\ regarding the reformed language
• declining to sever unenforceable parts of an arbitration clause where doing so would \leave[] uncertainty\ regarding the reformed language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).