Skip to main content
· 8/10/1995

KNOTTS BY KNOTTS v. Hassell

Citations

  • 659 So. 2d 886
  • 1995 WL 470327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no reversible error when the trial court excluded plaintiff’s expert on the ground that the testimony would be cumulative when plaintiff failed to make a proffer for court to determine if the testimony would be different or noncumulative
  • “This Court has long recognized the absolute privilege that is attached to relevant statements made during the course of judicial proceedings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hawkins, C.J., and Pittman and Banks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.