Knott v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that non-binding arbitration is not precluded from being enforced
• discussing how the Federal 21 Arbitration Act removes typical court discretion, such as denying stays of arbitrable matters
• discussing a district court’s lack of discretion under § 3 of the FAA to deny a stay “[i]f the issues in the case are within the contemplation of the arbitration agreement” and not discussing the FAA’s restrictions on appellate review of such interlocutory orders under § 16(b
• where federal agency prepared agreement, including its arbitration provision, sovereign immunity does not shield the agency from engaging in the arbitration process
• “Whether an agreement to enter into non-binding arbitration is enforceable under the FAA is not a matter well settled in the federal courts ....”
• \[A] misunderstanding or dispute may be submitted to arbitration for a determination [that] shall be binding upon approval by the FIA.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).