Skip to main content
· 12/29/1992

Knopfler v. Glidden Co. (In Re Germansen Decorating, Inc.)

Citations

  • 149 B.R. 517
  • 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 2077
  • 23 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1390
  • 1992 WL 404149

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “a violation of the automatic stay, § 362(a)(3
  • “[ijt makes no difference whether creditor gets [an] advantage as a result of a voluntary or involuntary transfer”
  • any transfer in violation of the automatic stay is void, without legal effect, and reversible
  • “any transfer in violation of the automatic stay is void and without legal effect”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert E. Ginsberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.