· 12/29/1992
Knopfler v. Glidden Co. (In Re Germansen Decorating, Inc.)
Citations
- 149 B.R. 517
- 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 2077
- 23 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1390
- 1992 WL 404149
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “a violation of the automatic stay, § 362(a)(3
- “[ijt makes no difference whether creditor gets [an] advantage as a result of a voluntary or involuntary transfer”
- any transfer in violation of the automatic stay is void, without legal effect, and reversible
- “any transfer in violation of the automatic stay is void and without legal effect”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robert E. Ginsberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.