Skip to main content
· 5/13/2011

Knop v. MacKall

Citations

  • 645 F.3d 381
  • 396 U.S. App. D.C. 60
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 9739
  • 2011 WL 1812497

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing district court’s imposition of fees because “Defendants’ asserted basis for removal . . . ha[d] at least some logical and precedential force behind it.”
  • “[T]he corporation in a shareholder derivative suit should be aligned as a defendant when the corporation is under the control of officers who are the target of the derivative suit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henderson, Griffith, Kavanaugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.