Knoll v. Phoenix Steel Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing a denial of a motion to modify a consent decree, not a motion for preliminary injunction, and applying the corresponding tripartite test
• “[T]he district court must ensure that the agreement is not illegal, a product of collusion, or against the public interest.”
• “If the court discerns a problem with a stipulated agreement, it should advise the parties of its concern and allow them an opportunity to revise the agreement.”
• “[H]arm is not irreparable if it is fully compensable by money damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).