Knoll v. Allied Interstate, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing answering machine message disclosure requirements in context of applying 1692d(6) to caller identification devices
• allowing Section 1692f claim based on same conduct as other FDCPA claims to proceed due to “expansive” nature of provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).