Skip to main content
· 4/18/1994

Knipschield v. C-J Recreation, Inc.

Citations

  • 872 P.2d 1102
  • 74 Wash. App. 212
  • 1994 Wash. App. LEXIS 219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to consider appellant's claim that Idaho law applied because appellant never raised or argued the applicability of Idaho law before the trial court
  • declining to consider appellant’s claim that Idaho law applied because appellant never raised or argued the applicability of Idaho law before the trial court
  • duty to defend in tort eases arises at the time of the tender of defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.