Knipe Land Co. v. Robertson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• analyzing request after concluding the appellants “sufficiently complied with the requirements” of I.A.R. 35(a)(5) despite improper location of their argument
• analyzing request after concluding the appellants “sufficiently complied with the requirements” of I.A.R. 35(a)(5) despite improper location of their argument
• “Where a legal instrument is found to be unambiguous the legal effect must be decided by the district court as a matter of law; it is only when the instrument is found to be ambiguous that evidence as to the meaning of that instrument may be submitted to the finder of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).