Knight's Admr. v. Schroader

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the statement that the creditor is \required to file a form [1099-C] with the Internal Revenue Service for any cancelled debt of $600 or more\ is not entirely accurate because it fails to notify the debtor of exceptions to the reporting requirement
• holding that the statement that the creditor is “required to file a form [1099-C] with the Internal Revenue Service for any cancelled debt of $600 or more” is not entirely accurate because it fails to notify the debtor of exceptions to the reporting requirement
• holding that the statement that the creditor is “required to file a form [1099-C] with the Internal Revenue Service for any cancelled debt of $600 or more” is not entirely accurate because it fails to notify the debtor of exceptions to the reporting requirement
• holding that the statement that the creditor is “required to file a form [1099-C] with the Internal Revenue Service for any cancelled debt of $600 or more” is not entirely accurate because it fails to notify the debtor of exceptions to the reporting requirement
• analyzing a creditor’s statement regarding the IRS reporting requirement and- explaining that while every exception need not be listed, the statement should make debtors aware that “potentially applicable exceptions exist”
• finding the statement that \GE CAPITAL RETAIL BANK is required to file a form 1099C with the Internal Revenue Service for any cancelled debt of $600 or more\ to be deceptive because exceptions may apply

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).