Knight v. Waltman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• an invitee's knowledge of a danger is not a complete bar to recovery, but rather triggers the application of comparative negligence
• “The invitee’s knowledge of the danger is not a complete bar to recovery, but rather triggers the application of comparative negligence.”
• “Clearly, the existence of the covered hole in the roof created a foreseeable ‘zone of risk’ that posed a general risk of harm to others.”
• “The discharge of the duty to warn does not necessarily discharge the duty to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).