Knight v. Walla Walla General Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “it appears well-established that a final EIS or the ROD issued thereon constitute the ‘final agency action’ for purposes of the APA” and collecting cases
• indicating that an agency’s determination may be set aside if it is “otherwise not in accordance with the law”
• rejecting plaintiffs’ attempt to establish adverse environmental impact by selectively focusing on temporary impacts only and “effects that would occur in the absence of a mitigation plan”
• \[I]t appears well-established that a final EIS or the ROD issued thereon constitute the 'final agency action' for purposes of the APA.\
• NEPA does not authorize a private right of action, but a plaintiff can bring a NEPA challenge through the APA
• “[I]t appears well-established that a final EIS or the ROD issued thereon constitute the ‘final agency action’ for purposes of the APA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).