Knight v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘Unless the remand limits the issues to be considered, the case should be reviewed in its entirety.’
• ‘Unless the remand limits the issues to be considered, the case should be reviewed in its entirety.’
• “Unless the remand limits the issues to be considered, the case should be reviewed in its entirety.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Waldrop v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1984-10-23· cited 57×
• Bryant v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2011-02-04· cited 34×
• Garrett v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1983-07-05· cited 28×
• State v. Calhoun
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1986-01-28· cited 15×
• Ex Parte Apicella, 1091436 (Ala. 5-13-2011)
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2011-05-13· cited 8×
• Ingram v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2012-08-24· cited 3×
• Apicella v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2011-12-16· cited 2×
• Springfield v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1986-12-30

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hughes
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1841-01-15· cited 34×
• Knight v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1977-03-29· cited 26×
• Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Attorney General
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1977-06-10· cited 18×
• Jeffries v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1867-01-15· cited 8×