Knight v. Schulman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• letter from debt collector to plaintiff acknowledging receipt of payment in full of amount of judgment was not a communication “made to collect a debt”
• “[Regardless of whether the Defendant was acting as an agent of the United States at the time the letters ... were written,” the FDCPA applied “[s]ince [he] was an attorney in private practice, rather than an officer or employee of the United States.”
• “[R]egardless of whether the Defendant was acting as an agent of the United States at the time the letters . . . were written,” the FDCPA applied “[s]ince [he] was an attorney in private practice, rather than an officer or employee of the United States.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).